Ownership Concentration and Cross-Autocorrelation in Portfolio Returns
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Cross- and Autocorrelation in multi-period Credit Portfolio Models
We investigate different well-known multi-step credit portfolio models, all endowed with cross dependency, in their time-discretized versions. Refining then the time discretization we show that the correlation structure of only one model is invariant under this refinement whereas the others are not. In particular, the correlation structure of Markov-Chain migration model converges to the limit ...
متن کاملDual Ownership , Returns , and Voting in Mergers
We document that in M&As a significant proportion of targets’ equity is owned by financial institutions that simultaneously own targets’ bonds (“dual holders”). Targets with larger equity ownership by dual holders have lower M&A equity premia and larger abnormal bond returns, particularly when dual holders stand to benefit more from appreciation of their bond stakes, e.g., when their bond owner...
متن کاملDiversification and ownership concentration
We consider a mean-variance general equilibrium economy where the expected returns for controlling and non-controlling shareholders are different because the former are able to divert a fraction of the profits. We find that when investor protection is poor, asset return correlation affects ownership structure in a positive way. Higher return correlation lowers the benefits of diversification wh...
متن کاملBreadth of Ownership and Stock Returns
We develop a model of stock prices in which there are both differences of opinion among investors as well as short-sales constraints. The key insight that emerges is that breadth of ownership is a valuation indicator. When breadth is low i.e., when few investors have long positions in the stock this signals that the short-sales constraint is binding tightly, implying that prices are high relati...
متن کاملAgency, Ownership, and Returns on Real Assets
Institutions commonly purchase fully utilized, prime properties of “institutional quality,” while other investors buy both underutilized and subprime properties. Managers of institutions with well diversified, liquid portfolios claim to be averse to the additional risk and illiquidity of noninstitutional assets. This behavior and its puzzling explanation are predicted by this dynamic model of c...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Business & Economic Review
سال: 2015
ISSN: 2074-1693,2519-1233
DOI: 10.22547/ber/7.2.5